Showing posts with label Urogynecology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urogynecology. Show all posts

Thursday, January 30, 2020

The Effectiveness of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Childbearing Age with Iron Deficiency Anemia-Juniper Publishers

Journal of Gynecology and Women’s Health

Iron deficiency is the most common minerals deficiency worldwide. Iron has a major role in producing hemoglobin in red blood cells, which is responsible for carrying oxygen to the body’s tissues. Treatment for an iron inadequacy depends on the cause and severity of the condition. Intravenous iron preparations are highly recommended when anemic pregnant women unable to tolerate, respond accordingly with better adherence to the regimen.
Aim of the research: This study is conducted to evaluate the possibility of using ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) as a first line treatment in pregnant women with IDA; and the effect of other contributor factors such as age, education, occupation, number of pregnancies and most importantly is the time of receiving FCM in term of first, second and third trimesters.
Methodology: Participants were gone through out personal interview answering some questions about their gestational situation and habits to achieve the study outcomes. All participants were pregnant women with abnormal hemoglobin whose either already received their first dose of FCM or those who are scheduled to take their first dose.
Result: Eighty-eight (88) pregnant women were participated in this study and their ages were divided into groups. The average of post FCM hemoglobin (10.99) after injection was significantly higher compared to the baseline hemoglobin (9.06). A shift to healthy and better response was shown after the FCM were shown in all participants.
Conclusion: A single intravenous injection of FCM improves the hemoglobin level in a significant consideration in anemic pregnant women. It showed also that the respond of sever anemic cases were more positive in improving the level of hemoglobin than mild and/or moderate cases. Blood transfusion could be avoided by using FCM injection to optimize the iron stores rapidly and effectively. Intravenous injection of FCM could be used as trend in the first and second trimester during pregnancy with or without IDA if the hemoglobin level is low.
Keywords: Ferric carboxymaltose; Iron deficiency; Iron deficiency; Hemoglobin

Introduction

Anemia is a blood disorder in which hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration is less than the normal Hgb level. It is affected by age, sex, physiological condition(s) and altitude above the sea level of that person [1]. It is a global public health problem with major consequences affecting both developing and developed countries [2]. The most common type of anemia is Iron deficiency anemia (IDA), which is defined as anemia because of insufficient iron [3]. Iron deficiency is the most common minerals deficiency worldwide. Women are at higher risk compared with men [4,5]. Iron has a major role in producing hemoglobin in red blood cells which is responsible for carrying oxygen to the body’s tissues [6]. Iron is a mineral naturally found in food and supplements, and it is available in two dietary forms: heme like in (meat, poultry, and seafood) and non-heme in (iron-fortified foods, plants- beans, nuts and vegetables). Essentially, meat and seafood are the richest sources of iron. However, some vegetables such as spinach, broccoli, and beetroot are considered as a good source for iron too. Although this disagrees with previous review concludes that “Vegetarians have a higher risk for developing low iron stores, iron depletion, and associated iron deficiency anemia, compared to non-vegetarians” [7].
According to world health organization (WHO) data, the prevalence of IDA in Saudi Arabia is 32.0% of pregnant women and 32.3% of women of reproductive age with anemia, which presents a moderate public health risk. Hemoglobin estimation is the most common and classical hematological screening test used for iron deficiency. According to (WHO), anemia is defined as low hemoglobin status; the cut off value for the pregnant women is Hgb<12g/dl, mild anemia (10.0-11.9g/dl), moderate (8.0-9.9g/dl) and severe (≤ 7.9g/dl). However, bone marrow aspiration is the definitive test to assess iron stores and diagnose its deficiency. Serum ferritin is an alternative to the bone marrow aspiration, and it is the best test to distinguishing those with IDA from those who are not iron deficient [2,8,9].
The level of serum ferritin, hemoglobin and hematocrit, and transferrin or total iron-binding capacity could evaluate iron inadequacy. The symptoms of iron deficiency vary, depending on its severity. Iron deficiency anemia can cause chronic fatigue, hair loss, cold hands and feet, shortness of breath and many other symptoms in addition to several physical signs. One of the characteristics symptoms is pagophagia, which is known by a craving to eat substance without nutritional value such as ice, dust or paint due to iron deficiency [10,11].
The reasons behind iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy can be classified into three causes. First, it can be as a result of the decrease in the hemoglobin level due to an increase in the maternal plasma volume. Second, begin the pregnancy with inadequate iron storage, which can lead to an inability to meet the requirements throughout the pregnancy. Last, an increase in the maternal demand for iron [12]. The body requirements for iron in pregnant woman nearly increases to 1000mg, which can be divided by, 350mg for placental and fetal growth, 250mg for blood loss at the delivery and the biggest part will be for the dilation in the red blood cell mass that will consume approximately 500mg iron [13]. Iron deficiency anemia lead to health problems such as rapid or irregular heartbeat, premature births and low birth weight babies and delayed growth and development [14].
Treatment for an iron inadequacy depends on the cause and severity of the condition. Iron deficiency anemia could be treated either orally or by intravenous (IV) injection. In spite of the fact that oral iron supplementations are considered as the first line option for the majority of pregnant women with IDA due to their effectiveness, safety, and lower cost; yet an intolerable side effects (gastrointestinal side effects), non-compliance and/or predisposing pathology such as malabsorption (celiac disease) may limit the use of oral ferrous supplements [15].
On the other hand, intravenous iron preparations are highly recommended when anemic pregnant women unable to tolerate, respond accordingly with better adherence to the regimen. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is a new type of iron III complex, dextran free, which makes it possible to be administered without a test dose for hypersensitivity, has a neutral PH (5.0-7.0) and physiological osmolality. Therefore, up to 1000 mg as single dose can be infused over 15-30 minutes, with lower side effects than oral iron supplement thus the patients are more compliant with injectable dosage form. If the patient did not respond adequately after a single dose of FCM, another dose can be administered one week later [10,16-18].
Ferrous as an element is a trend use for all pregnant women in most if not all gynecological clinics, usually the practitioners start with ferrous sulfate (FS) 325mg orally or ferrous gluconate (FG) 300mg orally. However, the starting point to prescribe ferrous is crucial to decide whether if the first, second or third trimester; moreover, what is the most appropriate and effective way to initiate FCM injection during pregnancy; and what is the most cost-effective treatment specifically if the pregnant women with IDA [19].

Methodology

Study Design

This is a cross-sectional, prospective study conducted to monitor symptoms improvement and normalization of hemoglobin level of the recruited participants.

Subjects

This study was conducted with a sample of eighty-eight (88) pregnant women aged between (20) and (44) years old; whom participated through out personal interview answering some questions about their gestational situation and habits to achieve the study outcomes. All participants were pregnant women with abnormal hemoglobin whose either already received their first dose of ferric carboxymaltose or those who are scheduled to take their first dose. Women who are post-delivery or pregnant women with normal hemoglobin are excluded from the study

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 version statistical software. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequencies and percentages) were used to describe the quantitative and categorical variables. Student’s paired t test was used to compare the mean values of quantitative variables (Hgb) between the baseline and post ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the mean difference of Hgb values in relation to the categorical variables, which has more than two categories. A p-value of ≤0.05 was used to report the statistical significance of findings to report the precision of results.

Setting

Research data were obtained from the King Abdullah University Hospital at the Princess Noura bint Abdulrahman University.

Ethical Consideration

All the participants involved in this study provided written informed consent acknowledging the investigation’s purpose and were assured of the confidentiality of the results. Institutional review board approval for the research was obtained from Health Sciences Research Center at Princess Noura bint Abdulrahman University, with IRB Log Number: 18-1098.

Result

Eighty-eight (88) pregnant women were participated in this study and their ages were divided into groups, from 20-25 years were 13 participants (14.8%), from 26-30 years 28(31.8%), from 31 to 35 years 27 (30.7%), and for 36 years and older were 20(22.7%). Their educational level was distributed as following: under high school 2(2.3%), high school 32(36.4%), bachelor’s degree 41 (46.6%), and master’s degree or above 13(14.8%). Their occupational status was assigned as employed 48 (54.5%) and un-employed 40(45.5%). More detail for the timing of FCM injection during the gestational trimester whether if it is first, second or third trimester, were shown in (Table 1), together with information related to the number of deliveries. The average of post ferric carboxymaltose hemoglobin (10.99) after injection was significantly higher compared to the baseline hemoglobin (9.06) (P<0.0001; 95% CI: 1.65-2.21).
In regard to age groups and its efficient in absorbing Hgb before FCM injection as a baseline and after FCM injection, compared to the whole group as shown in (Figure1). The range of hemoglobin level between baseline and after FCM injection was (9.06-10.99), showing the response of the participants after FCM injection with a difference of 1.93 for the whole group, where the maximum difference was 2.16 found with the group of 25 years and lower with no significant difference (p>0.05) compared with any of other age group including the minimal difference for the age group of 30-35 years with 1.7.
Another comparison for level of hemoglobin was found when FCM was injected within the gestational trimester, first, second and third trimester. It was found that although the third trimester with the highest hemoglobin level compare to the others, yet the first trimester showed the best response with a difference between the baseline and post FCM injection with 2.15. None of these differences were calculated as significantly different. Figure 2 showed relative differences between gestational trimesters first, second and third trimester compared with the total group before and after receiving one full dose of FCM.
Participants (at the baseline) were classified in accordance with WHO classification to mild, moderate and sever anemia. A shift to healthy and better response was shown after the FCM with 14 participants were shown within healthy hemoglobin level, compared with none at the baseline. Then a big shift 8, 70 and 10 out of the total participants as baseline before FCM injection for severe, moderate and mild anemia correspondingly. The improvement had shown after the FCM injection with only one participant with severe anemia or low hemoglobin level, 15 participants for moderate, and 58 participants become with mild anemia. It is also shown that 14 participants were getting full improvement and considered as health or non-anemic women. Table 2 showed full detail for all the data of this study mainly the shift of hemoglobin level during sever, moderate and mild to moderate, mild and healthy hemoglobin level before and after receiving FCM.

Discussion

This is the first prospective study for ferric carboxymaltose in Saudi Arabia among pregnant women presenting with IDA. An intravenous ferric carboxymaltose was remarkably increased hemoglobin levels without serious side effects were recorded. Only one case in this study had experienced dizziness, which were reported at the emergency department after FCM injection. FCM shown to be effective in childbearing age women with IDA, this phenomenon had been shown noticeable with those who aged with 25 or younger, where they have remarkably better response compared with other groups of age due to the ability to quickly absorb of iron as shown in (Figure 1). This difference is numerically deferent but not statistically deferent. Age as a factor in pregnant women with IDA had not been studied elsewhere; whereas in this study, age was divided into 4 age groups to study the associated differences of Hgb levels post FCM injection.
Results from this FCM analysis of pregnant women with IDA during first, second and third trimester of pregnancy showed that Hgb levels increased after FCM treatment with full safety parameters; therefore, intravenous FCM could be considered as a first line treatment for IDA pregnant women in case of severe cases. This is in contrast to CDC [20], WHO [21] and Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada [22], where all these authorities recommended oral iron supplementation in pregnant women as first line therapy. Intravenous iron is recommended when oral iron is poorly tolerated, absorption is likely to be impaired, the response to oral iron is inadequate, or when rapid restoration of Hgb and iron stores is required [23].
Oral iron supplementation could increase hemoglobin and ferritin levels in pregnancy, with or without IDA. This study demonstrated safe and effective use of FCM infusion in pregnant women during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy. Safety profile for intravenous FCM had been shown, having the practical advantage of allowing a higher iron dose in one time of administration (minimizing repeated administration times and increasing patient comfort) [24]. Another study showed Hgb levels significantly increased above baseline levels with 66% of women reported an improvement of their wellbeing with mostly minor and self-limiting side effects [25]. The cases described in this study was also in line with the retrospective case-control study from the Netherlands reporting similar significant increases in maternal Hgb levels above baseline and low rates of adverse outcomes [24]. Third trimester cases in this study had improvement with 21.3% with a single dose of intravenous injection of FCM (Figure 2).
It was noticed from this study that Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) was significantly increased hemoglobin levels, this increment in Hgb had been noticed started at 3 to 4 weeks interval post FCM dose; this achievement also had been previously studied [26]. The responses of severe anemic cases are more positive in improving the level of hemoglobin than mild and/or moderate cases after a single dose (1000mg) FCM. All cases related to severity of IDA had been shifted from sever, moderate, mild to moderate, mild, healthy respectively. Only one case with severe IDA remained severe after using FCM, therefore another dose maybe warranted.
Treatment of IDA will never lead to iron toxicity, however, incase of injection of higher dose above the requirements, it needs further monitoring although teratogenicity is with limited possibility, specifically if the treatment within the first trimester. If iron accumulation has been noticed, intravenous deferoxamine should be administered as chelation therapy [27]. Excessive Hgb levels were not observed in this study, all participants on FCM injection had elevated levels that fell within normal ranges.
Traditionally, blood transfusion is considered as an option in severe anemic cases; especially when oral replacement is not effectively and rapidly replenished the iron stores. The newly developed iron formulation such as FCM is offering the benefit of administrating a single higher dose with rapid, effective and safe repletion of iron, which can employ to avoid the risk of blood transfusion in severe anemia. This study could not find any correlation between Hgb levels and education, job, number of pregnancies, the consumed iron from food (vegetarian or not), and pagophagia.
A side issue related to the cost of treatment in comparison between FCM and oral ferrous treatment considering that the cost of FCM is 200$ per injection of 1000mg single dose with almost absolute treatment for more than 6 months and only one visit comparing with multiple visits, cost more than 200$ USD per each visit, and irregular treatment subjecting premature births and low birth weight babies and delayed growth and development.

Conclusion

This study approved that one intravenous injection of FCM improves the hemoglobin level in a significant consideration in anemic pregnant women. Also, it showed that the respond of sever anemic cases were more positive in improving the level of hemoglobin than mild and/or moderate cases. Only one case remained severe despite receiving one dose of FCM. Dizziness was experienced and reported by only one pregnant woman at the emergency department post FCM injection, which indicated its effectiveness and safety. Blood transfusion could be avoided by using FCM injection to optimize the iron stores rapidly and effectively. The proposed recommendation is that intravenous injection of FCM could be used as trend in the first and second trimester during pregnancy with or without IDA if the hemoglobin level is low. Moreover, Intravenous iron can be given late in pregnancy in the third trimester when rapid restoration of the iron stores and hemoglobin is required to avoid blood transfusion at delivery, it is also often needed after delivery when there is excessive bleeding in labor.
To Know More About Journal of Gynecology and Womens's Health Please click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/jgwh/index.php

To Know More About Open Access Journals Please click on: ttps://juniperpublishers.com/index.php

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Intrapartum Management of Glucose for Diabetes in Pregnancy-Juniper Publishers

Journal of Gynecology and Women’s Health


Diabetes mellitus (DM) in pregnancy can be classified into either pre-existing diabetes or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [1]. Gestational diabetes is defined as glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy [2]. Several adverse outcomes have been associated with diabetes during pregnancy and controlling blood glucose during pregnancy minimizes the risk of complications.
Furthermore, intrapartum glycaemic control is important for the foetus as factors such as foetal academia and hypoglycaemia are strongly related to maternal hyperglycaemia during labour. There is no clear recommendation regarding target blood glucose during labour. The National Maternity Hospital (NMH) is a tertiary level unit in Dublin, with more than 9000 births per year. A weekly multidisciplinary clinic is provided by endocrinologists, obstetricians, midwife diabetes specialists and dietitians. In this article we share our experience in the management of blood glucose during labour for patients attending the NMH with five different cases. These cases involve the spectrum of diabetes in pregnancy which include: Type 1 DM treated with insulin pump, Type 1DM on subcutaneous (SC) insulin, Type 2DM treated with subcutaneous insulin, GDM treated with Metformin and GDM treated with SC insulin. A specific labour protocol was used for each of the above patients which we believe contributed to good maternal and foetal outcomes and good blood glucose control.
Keywords: Pregnancy; Diabetes; Insulin labour management

Cases

Case 1

33 year old female para 1+0 with a history of gestational diabetes during her first pregnancy controlled with diet only with no complications. GDM was diagnosed at 21 weeks of gestation and treated with diet initially. At 22 weeks of gestation she required metformin 500mg twice daily and was under regular follow up in the maternity multidisciplinary diabetes clinic. Our patient had excellent blood glucose control until the end of pregnancy with a HbA1c of 31 mmol/mol and a fructosamine level of 183-185.
μmol/L. Her foetal scan at 36 weeks showed polyhydramnios and foetal abdominal circumference > 95th centile. At 39 weeks of gestation she went into labour and was started on protocol 1 for blood glucose control. She was prescribed to receive 2 units of aspart (SC) if glucose ≥ 6mmol/L and 3 units of aspart if
≥ 8mmol/L. She underwent a normal vaginal delivery and her labour lasted 4 hours and 34 minutes. Her blood glucose readings during labour were 5.3, 4.4 and 5.6mmol/l. She had a healthy 3.8kg baby boy with no neonatal hypoglycaemia. Post labour her blood glucose was checked only before meals for 48 hours and she was booked for an elective 2 hour 75g oral glucose tolerance test in the 6-12 weeks post-delivery.

Case 2

2 year old female para 0 diagnosed with gestational diabetes at 23 weeks of gestation. Initially started on diet control for two weeks but her control was suboptimal. She was commenced on insulin in the form of aspart and insulatard with regular follow up in the multidisciplinary diabetes in pregnancy clinic. The insulin doses were escalated to reach the target blood glucose and the patient required up to 30 units of insulin daily in the third trimester of pregnancy. The patient showed excellent blood glucose control, mostly on target, and had a HbA1c of 35-37mmol/mol and a fructosamine level of 187-189 μmol/L. Her foetal scan at 36 weeks of gestation was normal. At 37 weeks of gestation our patient went into labour and was started on protocol 2 for blood glucose control. She was prescribed one litre of Solution 18 with 20 mmol potassium chloride and 5 units of actrapid at an infusion rate of 125ml/h. A supplementary SC sliding scale was also prescribed with 3 units of aspart if blood glucose ≥6mmol/L and 4 units of aspart if ≥8mmol/L. She underwent normal vaginal delivery and her labour lasted 5 hours and 27 minutes. Her blood sugars during labour were 4.9, 5.5 and 4.4mmol/l. She had a healthy 2.6kg baby girl with no neonatal hypoglycaemia. Her insulin was held post delivery and blood glucose before meals was monitored for 48 hours. She was booked for an elective 2-hour 75g oral glucose tolerance test 6-12 weeks post delivery.

Case 3

29 year old female para 1+0 with a history of gestational diabetes during her first pregnancy and postpartum type 2 diabetes for 2 years duration. She was maintained on metformin 500mg twice daily with excellent control. She was evaluated by our team at the maternity diabetes clinic at 5 weeks of gestation, her initial HbA1c was 44mmol/mol and fructosamine level was 208μmol/L. Her blood glucose readings were above target and therefore her metformin was increased to 1000mg twice daily and she was started on insulin in the form of aspart and insulatard. She had regular follow up in the multidisciplinary diabetes in pregnancy clinic. The insulin doses were escalated to reach the target blood glucose and she required up to 47 units of insulin daily. Our patient showed excellent blood glucose control with the lowest HbA1c being 34 mmol/mol and a fructosamine level of 187-194μmol/L. Her foetal scan at 37 weeks of gestation was normal. At 38 weeks of gestation she went into labour and was started on protocol 2 for blood glucose control. She was prescribed one litre of Solution 18 with 20mmol potassium chloride and 8 units of actrapid at an infusion rate of 125ml/h. A supplementary SC sliding scale was also prescribed with 3 units of aspart if blood glucose ≥6mmol/l and 4 units of aspart if ≥8 mmol/L. She was delivered by caesarean section which lasted 35 minutes with a blood sugar of 4.9 mmol/l one hour prior to surgery, 6.1mmol/l during and 4.8mmol/l post-delivery. She delivered a healthy 2.8kg baby girl with no neonatal hypoglycaemia. Her insulin was stopped post delivery and her blood glucose was monitored for 48 hours. Her metformin dose was reduced to 500mg twice daily with a plan to follow her in a general diabetic clinic.

Case 4

35 year old female with a history of type 1 diabetes for 13 years duration. She was para 2 with two previous caesarean sections. She had uncontrolled diabetes pre pregnancy with a booking HbA1c of 67mmol/L and fructosamine level of 348μmol/L . Her pre-pregnancy diabetic regime was detemir 16 units daily and aspart 6 units with breakfast and lunch and 8 units with her evening meal. She was evaluated by our team at the maternity diabetes clinic at 5 weeks gestation and her insulin dose was adjusted according to her blood glucose readings on a regular basis. Her cetemir dose at its highest was 20 units per day and her aspart dose was escalated to a total of 48 units daily. This resulted in significant improvement in her diabetes control with her lowest HbA1c being 47mmol/L and her lowest fructosamine level being 241μmol/L. Her foetal scan at 37 weeks of gestation was normal. At 38 weeks of gestation she went into labour and was started on protocol 2 for blood glucose control. She was prescribed one litre of Solution 18 with 20mmol potassium chloride and 10 units of actrapid at an infusion rate of 125ml/h. A supplementary sliding scale was also prescribed with 3 units aspart if blood glucose was ≥ 6mmol/L and 4 units of aspart if ≥ 8mmol/L. She delivered via caesarean section which lasted one hour with a blood glucose of 6.9mmol/l prior to surgery, 6.2 and 6.9mmol/l during and 7.2mmol/l post-delivery. She had a healthy 3.9kg baby boy with no neonatal hypoglycaemia. Her insulin was reduced post labour to detemir 15 units and aspart 5 units with each meal. It was arranged that she be followed in a general diabetes clinic post delivery.

Case 5

39 year old female with type 1 diabetes for 24 years. Her diabetes was complicated by proliferative diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy. Our patient was commenced on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pump) with aspart insulin three years ago due to frequent hypoglycaemic episodes. This was her first pregnancy, and she was seen in our maternity diabetes clinic at 4 weeks of gestation. She had three basal rates per day with a carbohydrate correction ratio with all meals and an insulin sensitivity factor of 1:2. The patient required an average of 30 units of insulin per day. Her initial HbA1c was 79mmol/L and her fructosamine level was 325μmol/L. Her insulin dose was adjusted to reach the target for blood glucose control, requiring up to 5 basal rates of insulin and an average of 55 units of insulin per day. This improved her HbA1c to 41mmol/L and her fructosamine level to 240μmol/L. Her foetal scan at 34 weeks of gestation showed an abdominal circumference > 95th percentile. At 38 weeks of gestation she went into labour and was started on protocol 3 for blood glucose control. She was prescribed one litre of solution 18 with 20mmol potassium chloride at an infusion rate of 125ml/h and an insulin pump rate of 0.5 units/hour. A supplementary sliding scale was also prescribed with 3 units aspart if blood glucose ≥6mmol/L and 4 units of aspart if ≥8mmol/L. She delivered via caesarean section which lasted 40 minutes with a blood glucose of 4.4mmol/l prior to surgery, 6.2mmol/l during and 7.8mmol/l post-delivery. She had a healthy 3.8kg baby girl with no neonatal hypoglycaemia. Her insulin was reduced post labour with regular follow up in a diabetic clinic.

Discussion

Diabetes mellitus (DM) in pregnancy can be categorized into either pre-existing diabetes or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [1]. In both categories there is a higher risk of complication to the mother and the foetus. Preeclampsia, macrosomia, maternal and infant birth trauma, fatal hepatomegaly or cardiomegaly, operative delivery, perinatal mortality amongst others are all complications of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy [3]. Management of diabetes during pregnancy depends on the type and severity of diabetes. Pregnant women with pre-existing type 1DM can either be treated with subcutaneous insulin or continues subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Those with pre-existing Type 2DM can either be managed with insulin, oral hypoglycaemic agents or diet. GDM can also be managed with diet alone, oral hypoglycaemic agents and/or insulin. The main goal with any management plan is to achieve normoglycemia and to prevent maternal and foetal complications.
The occurrence of foetal acidaemia and hypoglycaemia is strongly associated with maternal hyperglycaemia during labour due to foetal hyperinsulinemia [4]. The reduced calorie intake and cessation of oral intake during the latent phase of labour and the higher energy requirement during the active phase of labour are both implicated in the lower insulin requirement during labour. Fluid solutions containing dextrose can also be important for optimal myometrial function during labour [5,6].
The metabolic changes during labour require close glucose level monitoring. However, the ideal blood glucose target during labour to prevent foetal complications is still unclear. The frequency of monitoring of blood glucose during the intrapartum period depends on the phase of labour. It is recommended to monitor capillary blood glucose 2-4 hourly during the latent phase of labour and 1-2 hourly during the active phase to achieve good glycaemic control [4]. Several guidelines and recommendations for target blood glucose have been summarised in Table 1. It’s important to note that a maternal blood glucose value of more than 10mmol/L (180mg/dl) during labour has been proven to be associated with a high risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia [7].
The diabetic management plan during labour should be individualized for each woman due to the differences in the type and severity of diabetes, beta cell reserve and the severity of insulin resistance. Unfortunately, a recommendation of optimal approach to achieve normoglycemia intrapartum does not exist due to the lack of well-designed, sufficiently powered, randomized trials. Here we share our experience of managing blood glucose levels during labour using fixed protocols. These protocols are individualized according to the type of diabetes during pregnancy, pre-delivery diabetic management and blood glucose control [8-11].

Compliance with Ethical Standards

a) This paper was not funded
b) Author Sulaiman Haji Ali declares that he has no conflict of interest
c) Author Recie Davern declares that she has no conflict of interest
d) Author Mensud Hatunic declares that he has no conflict of interest
e) Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors
f) Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study (Protocol 1-3).


 
To Know More About Open Access Journals Please click on: ttps://juniperpublishers.com/index.php

Typhlitis (Neutropenic Enterocolitis): A Multidisciplinary Approach- Juniper Publishers

   Reviews and Research- Juniper Publishers Abstract Typhlitis, or neutropenic enterocolitis, is a life-threatening gastrointestinal complic...